<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:3.0cm 2.0cm 3.0cm 2.0cm;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=DA link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>I agree with that. In steat of singing a c major, it sings a something between sharp and d major, and goes back down to c on the final la.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>DECtalk 5.0R2 and 5.0R3 sounds better in my upinion, however. Not much, but slightly.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Best regards:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Aksel Christoffersen<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>Fra:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Dectalk [mailto:dectalk-bounces@bluegrasspals.com] <b>På vegne af </b>Blake Roberts<br><b>Sendt:</b> 3. august 2019 04:45<br><b>Til:</b> DECtalk<br><b>Emne:</b> Re: [DECtalk] A DECtalk song I've made... again<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Dectalk 5.0 is definitely "broken". Not only does it sing the notes in a different key than 4.62, 5.0 also goes off-key on the final note. That is how it sounds to me...<br>Blake<br> <br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: Aksel Leo Christoffersen <aksel@blindsigtmail.dk><br>To: 'DECtalk' <dectalk@bluegrasspals.com><br>Sent: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 12:44:12 -0400 (EDT)<br>Subject: Re: [DECtalk] A DECtalk song I've made... again<br><br>Yes, it is that broken.<br><br>I used the exact same text file, I just changed the version number.<br><br>Best regards:<br>Aksel Christoffersen<br><br>-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----<br>Fra: Dectalk [mailto:dectalk-bounces@bluegrasspals.com] På vegne af Brandon Tyson<br>Sendt: 2. august 2019 18:42<br>Til: DECtalk<br>Emne: Re: [DECtalk] A DECtalk song I've made... again<br><br>Hello,<br><br>Are you sure that the DecTalk 5.0 was a C Major scale? It sounded way higher, and very much too sharp. Is it seriously that broken?<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Brandon<br><br>> On Aug 2, 2019, at 1:13 AM, Aksel Leo Christoffersen <aksel@blindsigtmail.dk> wrote:<br>> <br>> Yes, that was also why I made it, but I agree with Blake, that 4.3 is the best version in general.<br>> <br>> Version 4.6.2 is not the same as 5.0, but they sounds similar.<br>> <br>> Here's a demo file I made of each version.<br>> DECtalk 4.6.2:<br>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/u2apf9t367ghpsp/DECtalk%204.6.2.wav?dl=1<br>> <br>> DECtalk 5.0:<br>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/10mnup9786hut2q/DECtalk%205.0.wav?dl=1<br>> <br>> Best regards:<br>> Aksel Christoffersen<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----<br>> Fra: Dectalk [mailto:dectalk-bounces@bluegrasspals.com] På vegne af Brandon Tyson<br>> Sendt: 2. august 2019 02:49<br>> Til: DECtalk<br>> Emne: Re: [DECtalk] A DECtalk song I've made... again<br>> <br>> Hello,<br>> <br>> I'm listening to the 4.6.2 version and it sounds like the DecTalk 5.0<br>> that's available for NVDA. Are they the same?<br>> <br>> Is there somewhere where I can hear the 4.6.2 in more detail?<br>> <br>> I have to say that the song sounds much better in the 4.6.2 version<br>> because its pitches are matching with the music.<br>> <br>> Thanks,<br>> <br>> Brandon<br>> <br>> On 8/1/19, Blake Roberts <beroberts@hughes.net> wrote:<br>>> Aksel,<br>>> I thought your dectalk 4.62 version of this song was interesting, mostly<br>>> because that version of Dectalk sounds like it has a cold. I prefer 4.3 and<br>>> 4.4 myself. Thank you for sharing this for comparison with the Dectalk 4.3<br>>> version.<br>>> Blake<br>>> <br>>> ----- Original Message -----<br>>> From: Aksel Leo Christoffersen <aksel@blindsigtmail.dk><br>>> To: 'DECtalk' <dectalk@bluegrasspals.com><br>>> Sent: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 18:34:10 -0400 (EDT)<br>>> Subject: [DECtalk] A DECtalk song I've made... again<br>>> <br>>> Hi, Some time ago, I posted a DECtalk song I’ve made on this list called<br>>> This Is My Life, made by the danish band Gasolin’. Now, I’ve made the song<br>>> with DECtalk 4.6.2. I choose to make it with this version, because it sounds<br>>> so different from DECtalk 4.3, that I normaly use for my DECtalk songs.<br>>> Also, it’s tuned a little bit down from DECtalk 4.3, so it fits well with<br>>> the music. The voice it self is terrible however. First, for comparison,<br>>> here’s a link again to the old DECtalk 4.3<br>>> version:https://www.dropbox.com/s/xq61xpm3vfjo07b/DECtalk%20Sings%20-%20This%20Is%20My%20Life%20by%20Gasolin%27.wav?dl=1<br>>> And here’s a link to the new version with DECtalk<br>>> 4.6.2:https://www.dropbox.com/s/aydad81bea65n7z/DECtalk%204.6.2%20Sings%20-%20This%20Is%20My%20Life%20by%20Gasolin%27.wav?dl=1<br>>> I used the exact same text as for the 4.3 version, except i changed the ”l”,<br>>> phoneme to the ”ll”, phoneme. I look forward to hear your upinions. Best<br>>> regards:Aksel Christoffersen<br>> <br>> <br>> -- <br>> “Be what you are. This is the first step towards becoming better than you are.”<br>> – J. C. Hare & A. W. Hare<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Dectalk mailing list<br>> Dectalk@bluegrasspals.com<br>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<br>> <br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Dectalk mailing list<br>> Dectalk@bluegrasspals.com<br>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Dectalk mailing list<br>Dectalk@bluegrasspals.com<br>http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Dectalk mailing list<br>Dectalk@bluegrasspals.com<br>http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></body></html>