<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.7600.16766"></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 14pt" id=role_body bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document color=#000000 size=4 face=Arial>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4><A href="http://pastorsnoopi.twigs76.com/songs/HALLELUJAH%20COHORUS%20ACAPELLA.mp3">http://pastorsnoopi.twigs76.com/songs/HALLELUJAH%20COHORUS%20ACAPELLA.mp3</A></FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4>Well, I have 6 versions of the hallelujah chorus done,
the above link is to one of them. I think it shows how important Dectalk
is because without it no one could do anything like this. I look forward
to sampling other sapi's.</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4>SNOOPI BOTTEN </FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 5/11/2011 12:48:54 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
corine.bickley@gallaudet.edu writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>Great -
I'll accumulate the questions that I see for a few weeks as we<BR>test the
voices, and I'll get as many answers as Peter and Martha can<BR>supply, and
then I'll ask the listserv to fill in more answers based<BR>on your extensive
use and experience with various synthesizers. You<BR>have the experience to be
the best beta testers - trying the new SAPI<BR>DECtalk in all the various
configurations that you use, ones that we<BR>may not think of, and we
certainly don't own all those different<BR>machines and other synthesizers and
screen readers.<BR><BR>On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Alex H.
<linuxx64.bashsh@gmail.com> wrote:<BR>> Hi Corine,<BR>><BR>> A
list of FAQs would be a really helpful resource I think. This would<BR>>
help ensure that we get what we want and everybody is happy.<BR>><BR>>
Alex<BR>><BR>> On 5/11/11, Corine Bickley
<corine.bickley@gallaudet.edu> wrote:<BR>>> Your questions and
experiences concerning using various synthesizers<BR>>> are a great
resource for us all. I think it would be useful if Enable<BR>>> starts a
FAQ list based on your insights. What do you all think? Would<BR>>> that
be ok? Later this summer, I'll review the questions and formulate<BR>>>
a list and then post it and ask you all to supply answers based on<BR>>>
your experience. Let me know if you think this would be useful.<BR>>>
corine<BR>>><BR>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Brent Harding
<bharding@doorpi.net> wrote:<BR>>>> Not only to mention, if you
switch your synth to something like this and<BR>>>>
it<BR>>>> plain doesn't work, one has no speech to switch it
back.<BR>>>><BR>>>> ----- Original Message
-----<BR>>>> From: "Brandon Misch"
<bmisch2002@gmail.com><BR>>>> To: "DECtalk Discussions"
<dectalk@bluegrasspals.com><BR>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011
9:03 PM<BR>>>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Access 32 Legality
Questions<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>>> i'm sure there
are all kinds of versions of that synth. one version had<BR>>>>>
me<BR>>>>> coppying files and stuff like
that.<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> On May 10, 2011, at 9:02 PM,
Blake Roberts wrote:<BR>>>>><BR>>>>>> I know that
the version of Dectalk Access32 on Freedom Scientific's
site<BR>>>>>> was<BR>>>>>> designed for Jaws 3
or 4. This was back in the days of Jaws<BR>>>>>>
authorization<BR>>>>>> diskettes. I wonder if FS's copy
of Dectalk Access32 will install for<BR>>>>>>
use<BR>>>>>> with a modern version of
Jaws.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> In the past, I've tried
using a couple different versions of Dectalk<BR>>>>>> Access32
that I got from various sources. With one version, I
could<BR>>>>>> never<BR>>>>>> get past "please
insert authorization disk to continue". The other<BR>>>>>>
(stand-alone) version simply would not talk when I tried using it
with<BR>>>>>> Jaws<BR>>>>>>
11.<BR>>>>>> Blake<BR>>>>>> -----Original
Message-----<BR>>>>>> From:
dectalk-bounces@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>>>>>
[mailto:dectalk-bounces@bluegrasspals.com] On Behalf Of Brandon
Misch<BR>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 8:40
PM<BR>>>>>> To: DECtalk Discussions<BR>>>>>>
Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Access 32 Legality
Questions<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> one thing to note is
the version of access 32 for jaws is still on fs's<BR>>>>>>
site<BR>>>>>> and may still work. i don't know if it does
though. that uses dectalk<BR>>>>>>
4.41.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> On May 10, 2011, at 6:57
PM, Jayson Smith wrote:<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>>
Hi,<BR>>>>>>><BR>>>>>>> Unfortunately, as
far as I know there is no way to make a copy of
the<BR>>>>>>> Access32 protected disk. Certain versions of
Jaws used a protection<BR>>>>>>> system called Quella. Those
disks could be copied if you knew what you<BR>>>>>> were
doing.<BR>>>>>>> However, the only copy of Access32 I ever
saw used a protection<BR>>>>>>> product called Everlock. I
never found any way to make a faithful copy<BR>>>>>>> of an
Everlock disk.<BR>>>>>>><BR>>>>>>> As for
getting your authorization off the old laptop, have you
checked<BR>>>>>>> that the floppy is not write protected? If
so, the floppy could be<BR>>>>>>> bad, in which case that
copy is no good any more. Please note, just<BR>>>>>>>
copying the actual authorization files from the old hard drive to
one<BR>>>>>>> on any other computer will *not* work. If you
can figure out a way to<BR>>>>>>> get the uninstall process
to complete successfully, there may be a way<BR>>>>>>> for
you to, shall we say, regain your two lost authorizations.
This<BR>>>>>>> would need to be done in DOS, since I think
most if not all Everlock<BR>>>>>>> disks I saw included DOS
tools as well as Windows ones. There's a<BR>>>>>>> program I
have called Unlimited Installer. The way it works is,
it<BR>>>>>>> diverts all hard drive writes to a RAM buffer.
So you have the<BR>>>>>>> authorization installed, run the
program, then uninstall the<BR>>>>>>> authorization. Now you
reboot. Since the hard drive never got written,<BR>>>>>>>
the authorization is still there, as well as on the floppy. But none
of<BR>>>>>> that will be worth a hill of beans if you can't get
the uninstall to<BR>>>>>> work.<BR>>>>>>>
Jayson<BR>>>>>>><BR>>>>>>> ----- Original
Message -----<BR>>>>>>> From: "Michael Hansen"
<amtk62@gmail.com><BR>>>>>>> To: "DECtalk Discussions"
<dectalk@bluegrasspals.com><BR>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday,
May 10, 2011 6:00 PM<BR>>>>>>> Subject: [DECtalk] Access 32
Legality
Questions<BR>>>>>>><BR>>>>>>><BR>>>>>>>>
Hi guys,<BR>>>>>>>><BR>>>>>>>> I
have a couple questions regarding legal use of Access
32:<BR>>>>>>>><BR>>>>>>>> Is it
legal to install Access 32 from a Kurzweil 1000 CD without
an<BR>>>>>>>> authorization disc, since it pretty much
installs regardless of<BR>>>>>>>> whether there is one
present or not? I have access to a
Kurzweil<BR>>>>>>>> disc from school (that kind of
software is distributed to students<BR>>>>>>>>
for<BR>>>>>>>> free) but there is no DECtalk
authorization disc. DECtalk Access 32<BR>>>>>>>> is
there on the disc, and it installs regardless of whether there
is<BR>>>>>>>> an authorization disc or
not.<BR>>>>>>>><BR>>>>>>>> Also, I
have a copy of Access 32 from GW Micro that my
parents<BR>>>>>>>> obtained in 2002. I have one
authorization left (the others were<BR>>>>>>>> lost due
to computer crashes) and it is on an old HP laptop.
For<BR>>>>>>>> some reason, when I go to transfer
the data back to the copy<BR>>>>>>>> protection disc, it
will not work. I haven't tried it in
several<BR>>>>>>>> months, but I recall a write error of
some kind. Assuming I am<BR>>>>>>>> unable to find
a way to get that copy protection off that laptop,
is<BR>>>>>>>> there a legal way I can get around the
authorization since I *do* own<BR>>>>>>>> the product?
I've tried contacting GW Micro, and they were no
help.<BR>>>>>>
Thoughts?<BR>>>>>>>><BR>>>>>>>>
Thanks,<BR>>>>>>>>
Michael<BR>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>>>>>>>
DECtalk mailing list<BR>>>>>>>>
DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>>>>>>>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>>>>>>><BR>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>>>>>>
DECtalk mailing list<BR>>>>>>>
DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>>>>>>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>>>>>
DECtalk mailing list<BR>>>>>>
DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>>>>>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>>>>>
DECtalk mailing list<BR>>>>>>
DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>>>>>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>>>> DECtalk
mailing list<BR>>>>> DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>>>>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>>> DECtalk
mailing list<BR>>>> DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>>>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>>>><BR>>><BR>>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>> DECtalk mailing
list<BR>>> DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>>><BR>><BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> DECtalk mailing
list<BR>> DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>DECtalk
mailing
list<BR>DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>