<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.7600.16766"></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 14pt" id=role_body bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document color=#000000 size=4 face=Arial>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4>it needs the commands. Let me emplane why.
Most of you on this list just make Dectalk sing for fun. People who can't
talk, have no other way of singing, Dectalk is the only way they have to
sing. I'm one of them, but only one of many. Today I'm trying to
finish "THE HALLELUJAH CHORUS" in 4 part harmony so 4 people with Dectalk can
all sing together. I wanted more parts but I can't find a version of sheet
music that has more than 4 parts.</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4>In any event, there is a serious problem coming
up. I have no idea why, but the 4.40 speak window will not install in the
latest update of Windows 7, the en files will not associate with the speak
window. I now have 3 known computers that the speak window will not run
on.</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4>Blake and I have posted about this several times but
it keeps getting ignored. Guys, if we don't solve this problem, and if any
of you ever switch computers, you might not be able to run
Dectalk.</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4>SNOOPI BOTTEN </FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 5/8/2011 11:58:43 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
bmisch2002@gmail.com writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>thanks
both of you for this project. maybe when you guys get the code compiled
wright, or the wright code at all, you can make a sapi version of dectalk that
is better than the stuff already put out there. maybe a sapi dectalk with not
just voices but commands and everything. <BR><BR>On May 8, 2011, at 12:46 PM,
Blake Roberts wrote:<BR><BR>> Ed,<BR>> Thanks for the clarification and
your dedication to, like Corine, not give<BR>> up on Dectalk.<BR>> Blake
<BR>> <BR>> -----Original Message-----<BR>> From:
dectalk-bounces@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>
[mailto:dectalk-bounces@bluegrasspals.com] On Behalf Of ebruckert
Bruckert<BR>> Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 12:42 PM<BR>> To: DECtalk
Discussions<BR>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] something i heard<BR>> <BR>>
I'm sorry I have to set the record straight. I am the one that
supplied<BR>> Kareem with code and there was confusion because they hadn't
been compiled<BR>> in a while and I knew they needed fixing and I don't
think that was truly<BR>> understood and no I didn't get a single penny.
Neither am I giving up I need<BR>> a decent DECtalk as well this went down
the rat hole for various reasons and<BR>> I'm not giving up I want one I
don't want to play a blame game however. But<BR>> nobody intentionally did
anything wrong period. <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 12:33
PM, Michael Hansen <amtk62@gmail.com> wrote:<BR>> <BR>>
<BR>> So basicly, if I understand this right, someone in
essence took<BR>> advantage of Corine's lack of DECtalk
knowledge and sold her a code<BR>> to<BR>> Fonix Talk--or
something very nearly like it--and said it was good?<BR>> How
aweful.<BR>> <BR>> It's all starting to make
sense now. Corine, I for one am very<BR>> sorry<BR>>
for contributing to your company's public humiliation on this<BR>>
mailing<BR>> list. It appears Fonix is the one to blame,
and if they really did<BR>> screw you guys over (I know you can
never say that publicly) then<BR>> that<BR>> is a real
shame. Thank you for trying, and thank you for<BR>>
withholding<BR>> this release.<BR>>
<BR>> Best,<BR>> Michael
Hansen<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> On 5/8/11,
Dectalk@aol.com <Dectalk@aol.com> wrote:<BR>> > Yes
but guys, can we be sensitive here for Corine? She cares
so<BR>> much that<BR>> > she put a lot of money into
this. She was sold a bad code and<BR>> has no
way<BR>> > to get a refund. This is both happy
and sad news. We should all<BR>> deeply<BR>>
> thank her for trying.<BR>> ><BR>>
><BR>> > SNOOPI BOTTEN<BR>>
><BR>> ><BR>> > In a message dated
5/8/2011 11:37:11 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,<BR>> >
beroberts@hughes.net writes:<BR>> ><BR>> >
Alex did a fantastic job creating the Dectalk vs. FonixTalk file<BR>>
that<BR>> > Jayson<BR>> > shared.
Excellent job on production, Alex.<BR>> > I agree with
Jayson about Dectalk 86 sounding more like FonixTalk<BR>>
than<BR>> > Dectalk. It is certainly good news
that Enable wil not be<BR>> marketing<BR>> >
Dectalk<BR>> > 86.<BR>> >
Blake<BR>> > -----Original
Message-----<BR>> > From:
dectalk-bounces@bluegrasspals.com<BR>> >
[mailto:dectalk-bounces@bluegrasspals.com] On Behalf Of Jayson<BR>>
Smith<BR>> > Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 11:05
AM<BR>> > To: DECtalk Discussions<BR>>
> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] something i heard<BR>>
><BR>> > I have to sort of agree with this,
although Corine has stated<BR>> that the<BR>> >
so-nicknamed DECtalk 86 doesn't use FonixTalk. To hear a sample of<BR>>
the real<BR>> > FonixTalk, listen to the
following file.<BR>> >
http://www.q-audio.net/d/18754<BR>> > I think DECtalk 86
sounds more like FonixTalk than it does any<BR>> version
of<BR>> > DECtalk including 4.64 or
5.0.<BR>> > Jayson<BR>>
><BR>> > ----- Original Message -----<BR>>
> From: "Brandon Misch"
<bmisch2002@gmail.com><BR>> > To: "DECtalk
Discussions" <dectalk@bluegrasspals.com><BR>> >
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 7:26 PM<BR>> > Subject:
[DECtalk] something i heard<BR>> ><BR>>
><BR>> >> Hey guys i let someone hear a demo of
the speak window for the<BR>> sapi<BR>> >> dectalk
that enable is selling and that person said that this is<BR>>
based<BR>> > on<BR>> >> fonix
talk. don't know if anyone came up with that yet.<BR>>
>><BR>> >><BR>> >>
_______________________________________________<BR>> >>
DECtalk mailing list<BR>> >>
DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>> >>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>>
><BR>> >
_______________________________________________<BR>> >
DECtalk mailing list<BR>> >
DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>> >
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>>
><BR>> >
_______________________________________________<BR>> >
DECtalk mailing list<BR>> >
DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>> >
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>>
><BR>> ><BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> DECtalk
mailing list<BR>> DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>> <BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> DECtalk mailing
list<BR>> DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>DECtalk
mailing
list<BR>DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>