<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.7600.16766"></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 14pt" id=role_body bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document color=#000000 size=4 face=Arial>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4>Actually, does anyone have or know how to create a
4.40 installer that will do the file association?</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=4>SNOOPI BOTTEN </FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 5/9/2011 10:40:32 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
ratguy@insightbb.com writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>Hi,<BR><BR>Probably what really needs to happen when it comes right
down to it is that <BR>the Speak window needs to be rewritten from scratch.
That program, in one <BR>form or another, has been around for quite some time.
Technology changes, <BR>and Speak probably hasn't kept up. Unfortunately, the
only Speak window I <BR>know of which actually uses a dectalk.dll is the most
recent one, for the <BR>so-nicknamed DECtalk 86. All the others I've seen
appear to have the actual <BR>DECtalk code included within the Speak
executable. My thought is that, if <BR>you had a dectalk.dll and knew how it
worked, you could write a replica <BR>Speak window from scratch, in a language
of your choice.<BR>Jayson<BR><BR>----- Original Message ----- <BR>From:
<Dectalk@aol.com><BR>To: <dectalk@bluegrasspals.com><BR>Sent:
Monday, May 09, 2011 7:34 AM<BR>Subject: Re: [DECtalk] something i
heard<BR><BR><BR>> it needs the commands. Let me emplane
why. Most of you on this list <BR>> just<BR>> make Dectalk
sing for fun. People who can't talk, have no other way of<BR>>
singing, Dectalk is the only way they have to sing. I'm one of
them, but<BR>> only one of many. Today I'm trying to finish
"THE HALLELUJAH CHORUS" in <BR>> 4<BR>> part harmony so 4 people with
Dectalk can all sing together. I wanted <BR>> more<BR>>
parts but I can't find a version of sheet music that has more than 4
<BR>> parts.<BR>><BR>> In any event, there is a serious problem
coming up. I have no idea why,<BR>> but the 4.40 speak window
will not install in the latest update of <BR>> Windows<BR>> 7, the
en files will not associate with the speak window. I now have
3<BR>> known computers that the speak window will not run
on.<BR>><BR>> Blake and I have posted about this several times but
it keeps getting<BR>> ignored. Guys, if we don't solve this problem,
and if any of you ever <BR>> switch<BR>> computers, you might not
be able to run Dectalk.<BR>><BR>><BR>> SNOOPI
BOTTEN<BR>><BR>><BR>> In a message dated 5/8/2011 11:58:43 P.M.
Eastern Daylight Time,<BR>> bmisch2002@gmail.com writes:<BR>><BR>>
thanks both of you for this project. maybe when you guys get the
code<BR>> compiled wright, or the wright code at all, you can make a
sapi version <BR>> of<BR>> dectalk that is better than the stuff
already put out there. maybe a sapi<BR>> dectalk with not just voices
but commands and everything.<BR>><BR>> On May 8, 2011, at 12:46
PM, Blake Roberts wrote:<BR>><BR>>> Ed,<BR>>> Thanks for
the clarification and your dedication to, like Corine, not<BR>>
give<BR>>> up on Dectalk.<BR>>> Blake<BR>>><BR>>>
-----Original Message-----<BR>>> From:
dectalk-bounces@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>>
[mailto:dectalk-bounces@bluegrasspals.com] On Behalf Of ebruckert<BR>>
Bruckert<BR>>> Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 12:42 PM<BR>>> To:
DECtalk Discussions<BR>>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] something i
heard<BR>>><BR>>> I'm sorry I have to set the record
straight. I am the one that supplied<BR>>> Kareem with code and
there was confusion because they hadn't been<BR>>
compiled<BR>>> in a while and I knew they needed fixing and I
don't think that was <BR>>> truly<BR>>> understood and no I
didn't get a single penny. Neither am I giving up I<BR>>
need<BR>>> a decent DECtalk as well this went down the rat hole
for various reasons<BR>> and<BR>>> I'm not giving up I want one
I don't want to play a blame game however.<BR>> But<BR>>>
nobody intentionally did anything wrong
period.<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 12:33
PM, Michael Hansen <amtk62@gmail.com> <BR>>>
wrote:<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> So basicly, if I
understand this right, someone in essence took<BR>>>
advantage of Corine's lack of DECtalk knowledge and sold her a
code<BR>>> to<BR>>> Fonix Talk--or something
very nearly like it--and said it was good?<BR>>> How
aweful.<BR>>><BR>>> It's all starting to make
sense now. Corine, I for one am very<BR>>> sorry<BR>>>
for contributing to your company's public humiliation on
this<BR>>> mailing<BR>>> list. It appears
Fonix is the one to blame, and if they really
did<BR>>> screw you guys over (I know you can never
say that publicly) then<BR>>> that<BR>>> is a
real shame. Thank you for trying, and thank you
for<BR>>> withholding<BR>>> this
release.<BR>>><BR>>> Best,<BR>>>
Michael Hansen<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> On
5/8/11, Dectalk@aol.com <Dectalk@aol.com>
wrote:<BR>>> > Yes but guys, can we be sensitive
here for Corine? She cares so<BR>>> much
that<BR>>> > she put a lot of money into
this. She was sold a bad code and<BR>>> has no
way<BR>>> > to get a refund. This is both
happy and sad news. We should all<BR>>>
deeply<BR>>> > thank her for
trying.<BR>>> ><BR>>>
><BR>>> > SNOOPI BOTTEN<BR>>>
><BR>>> ><BR>>> > In a message
dated 5/8/2011 11:37:11 A.M. Eastern Daylight
Time,<BR>>> > beroberts@hughes.net
writes:<BR>>> ><BR>>> > Alex
did a fantastic job creating the Dectalk vs. FonixTalk
file<BR>>> that<BR>>> >
Jayson<BR>>> > shared. Excellent job on
production, Alex.<BR>>> > I agree with Jayson about
Dectalk 86 sounding more like FonixTalk<BR>>>
than<BR>>> > Dectalk. It is certainly good
news that Enable wil not be<BR>>>
marketing<BR>>> > Dectalk<BR>>>
> 86.<BR>>> > Blake<BR>>> >
-----Original Message-----<BR>>> >
From: dectalk-bounces@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>>
> [mailto:dectalk-bounces@bluegrasspals.com] On Behalf Of
Jayson<BR>>> Smith<BR>>> > Sent: Sunday, May
08, 2011 11:05 AM<BR>>> > To: DECtalk
Discussions<BR>>> > Subject: Re: [DECtalk] something i
heard<BR>>> ><BR>>> > I have
to sort of agree with this, although Corine has stated<BR>>>
that the<BR>>> > so-nicknamed DECtalk 86
doesn't use FonixTalk. To hear a sample of<BR>>> the
real<BR>>> > FonixTalk, listen to the
following file.<BR>>> >
http://www.q-audio.net/d/18754<BR>>> > I think DECtalk
86 sounds more like FonixTalk than it does any<BR>>>
version of<BR>>> > DECtalk including 4.64
or 5.0.<BR>>> > Jayson<BR>>>
><BR>>> > ----- Original Message
-----<BR>>> > From: "Brandon Misch"
<bmisch2002@gmail.com><BR>>> > To: "DECtalk
Discussions" <dectalk@bluegrasspals.com><BR>>>
> Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 7:26 PM<BR>>>
> Subject: [DECtalk] something i heard<BR>>>
><BR>>> ><BR>>> >> Hey guys i
let someone hear a demo of the speak window for the<BR>>>
sapi<BR>>> >> dectalk that enable is
selling and that person said that this is<BR>>>
based<BR>>> > on<BR>>> >>
fonix talk. don't know if anyone came up with that
yet.<BR>>> >><BR>>>
>><BR>>> >>
_______________________________________________<BR>>>
>> DECtalk mailing list<BR>>>
>> DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>>
>>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>>>
><BR>>> >
_______________________________________________<BR>>>
> DECtalk mailing list<BR>>> >
DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>> >
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>>>
><BR>>> >
_______________________________________________<BR>>>
> DECtalk mailing list<BR>>> >
DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>> >
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>>>
><BR>>> ><BR>>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>>
DECtalk mailing list<BR>>>
DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>> DECtalk
mailing list<BR>>> DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>><BR>><BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> DECtalk
mailing list<BR>> DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>><BR>><BR><BR><BR>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR><BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> DECtalk mailing
list<BR>> DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>>
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR>>
<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>DECtalk mailing
list<BR>DECtalk@bluegrasspals.com<BR>http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk<BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>