[DECtalk] legality of dectalk, II

[Brandon Tyson]

Hello,

I saw a page pertaining to the archive I posted awhile back.
Is the Blake this article refers to Blake Roberts?

http://www.theflameofhope.co/DECTALK%20READER%201.html

What would the status of this DecTalk SAPI be?

Thanks,

Brandon

On 7/18/19, Josh Kennedy <joshknnd1982 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Copyright law is just plain broken and it needs a serious overhaul!
> Speech-fx has to know about the decTalk stuff, floating around the internet
> for free. Anyone who google searches it can find it easy enough several
> places. Unless speech-fx only cares about you if you have a big company
> behind you and can fork over $20000 or so.
>
> Josh
>
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
> From: Jayson Smith
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2019 17:57
> To: DECtalk Discussions
> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] legality of dectalk, II
>
> Hi,
>
> Much as I'd like to say this is true, that's just his thoughts on the
> matter. I assume the DECtalk intellectual property is owned by Speech-FX,
> and if that's the case, only they can legally make such a declaration, no
> one else.
>
> Jayson
>
> On 7/18/2019 5:41 PM, Josh Kennedy wrote:
> Hi,
> I found this interesting post back in the archives of this list.
>
> http://bluegrasspals.com/pipermail/dectalk/2014-July/003897.html
>
> so is this true? DecTalk is open for all? As long as its an older version
> not licensed by speech-fx inc or fonixTalk?
>
> Josh
>
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dectalk mailing list
> Dectalk at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>
>
>


-- 
“Be what you are. This is the first step towards becoming better than you are.”
– J. C. Hare & A. W. Hare