[DECtalk] something i heard

[Blake Roberts]

Ed,
Thanks for the clarification and your dedication to, like Corine, not give
up on Dectalk.
Blake 

-----Original Message-----
From: dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com
[mailto:dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com] On Behalf Of ebruckert Bruckert
Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 12:42 PM
To: DECtalk Discussions
Subject: Re: [DECtalk] something i heard

 I'm sorry I have to set the record straight. I am the one that supplied
Kareem with code and there was confusion because they hadn't been compiled
in a while and I knew they needed fixing and I don't think that was truly
understood and no I didn't get a single penny. Neither am I giving up I need
a decent DECtalk as well this went down the rat hole for various reasons and
I'm not giving up I want one I don't want to play a blame game however. But
nobody intentionally did anything wrong period. 


On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Michael Hansen <amtk62 at gmail.com> wrote:


	So basicly, if I understand this right, someone in essence took
	advantage of Corine's lack of DECtalk knowledge and sold her a code
to
	Fonix Talk--or something very nearly like it--and said it was good?
	How aweful.
	
	It's all starting to make sense now.  Corine, I for one am very
sorry
	for contributing to your company's public humiliation on this
mailing
	list.  It appears Fonix is the one to blame, and if they really did
	screw you guys over (I know you can never say that publicly) then
that
	is a real shame.  Thank you for trying, and thank you for
withholding
	this release.
	
	Best,
	Michael Hansen
	

	On 5/8/11, Dectalk at aol.com <Dectalk at aol.com> wrote:
	> Yes but guys, can we be sensitive here for  Corine?  She cares so
much that
	> she put a lot of money into this.  She  was sold a bad code and
has no way
	> to get a refund.  This is both happy and  sad news.  We should all
deeply
	> thank her for trying.
	>
	>
	> SNOOPI BOTTEN
	>
	>
	> In a message dated 5/8/2011 11:37:11 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
	> beroberts at hughes.net writes:
	>
	> Alex did  a fantastic job creating the Dectalk vs. FonixTalk file
that
	> Jayson
	> shared.  Excellent job on production, Alex.
	> I agree with Jayson about Dectalk 86  sounding more like FonixTalk
than
	> Dectalk.  It is certainly good news  that Enable wil not be
marketing
	> Dectalk
	> 86.
	> Blake
	> -----Original  Message-----
	> From:  dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com
	> [mailto:dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com]  On Behalf Of Jayson
Smith
	> Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 11:05 AM
	> To:  DECtalk Discussions
	> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] something i heard
	>
	> I have  to sort of agree with this, although Corine has stated
that  the
	> so-nicknamed DECtalk 86 doesn't use FonixTalk. To hear a sample of
the  real
	> FonixTalk, listen to the following  file.
	> http://www.q-audio.net/d/18754
	> I think DECtalk 86 sounds more like  FonixTalk than it does any
version of
	> DECtalk including 4.64 or  5.0.
	> Jayson
	>
	> ----- Original Message -----
	> From: "Brandon Misch"  <bmisch2002 at gmail.com>
	> To: "DECtalk Discussions"  <dectalk at bluegrasspals.com>
	> Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 7:26  PM
	> Subject: [DECtalk] something i heard
	>
	>
	>> Hey guys i let  someone hear a demo of the speak window for the
sapi
	>> dectalk that  enable is selling and that person said that this is
based
	> on
	>> fonix  talk. don't know if anyone came up with that yet.
	>>
	>>
	>>  _______________________________________________
	>> DECtalk mailing  list
	>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
	>>  http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
	>
	> _______________________________________________
	> DECtalk mailing  list
	> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
	> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
	>
	> _______________________________________________
	> DECtalk  mailing  list
	> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
	> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
	>
	>
	_______________________________________________
	DECtalk mailing list
	DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
	http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk