[DECtalk] Any news?

Raymond Grote musicalman1 at comcast.net
Thu May 5 22:08:31 EDT 2011


And, I was able to make rather amusing sounds by putting one note in for 
singing. I put in a low c, and instead of being a low c, it was like a sigh 
of satisfaction. It started at an e, went down to a d, then got breathy and 
ended. I can clarify if needed. Maybe post a sample and the code I used. But 
it was funny.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alex H." <linuxx64.bashsh at gmail.com>
To: "DECtalk Discussions" <dectalk at bluegrasspals.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any news?


>I was also under the impression that the testers were supposed to give
> feedback about the project and so on, but when they did, they got
> nothing but snide remarks that it's the same, "you don't know what
> you're talking about," etc. That sort of thing is just not cool,
> seeing as you're supposed to sell this! I hope nobody buys this just
> to proove the point that this is just not even close to being ready
> for any type of release!
>
> But I suppose, at this rate we're just screaming at the wind and
> nothing will change.
>
> Alex
>
>
>
> On 5/5/11, Raymond Grote <musicalman1 at comcast.net> wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure it will. The least we can do is not buy it and discourage
>> others from using it, unless they decide to make a change. I am hoping 
>> they
>> will, but I'm very sure they won't.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>   From: Brandon Misch
>>   To: DECtalk Discussions
>>   Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 9:22 PM
>>   Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any news?
>>
>>
>>   sounds like it's going to be released no matter what and even if some 
>> on
>> this list want it scrapped it looks like this will be released.
>>
>>
>>   On May 5, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Dectalk at aol.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>     Bingo!  That's why it would be better to scrap it.  If released as 
>> is,
>> it messes with a dead man's life long reputation.  I'm sick over this!
>>
>>
>>     SNOOPI BOTTEN
>>
>>     In a message dated 5/5/2011 7:21:25 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>> ratguy at insightbb.com writes:
>>       What's worse is that, if this gets released in its current state, 
>> any
>> good
>>       name DECtalk may have had will get tarnished. We all thought Force 
>> did
>>       horrible things with it. Now this! Someone who sees that a SAPI
>> version of
>>       DECtalk is available is likely to get excited if they know what
>> DECtalk is.
>>       When they put down their bucks to actually buy the thing, I hate to
>> even
>>       think what the reactions will be. This is ridiculous, and an insult 
>> to
>>       Dennis Klatt.
>>       Someone who just wants a SAPI synth who has no idea what DECtalk is
>> might
>>       find the Paul voice acceptable. It sounds like an old guy, which is
>>       certainly *not!* how it's supposed to sound. But I'd love to tell 
>> such
>> a
>>       person to type [:nu] and see what happens after that.
>>       Jayson
>>
>>       ----- Original Message -----
>>       From: "Alex H." <linuxx64.bashsh at gmail.com>
>>       To: "DECtalk Discussions" <dectalk at bluegrasspals.com>
>>       Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 7:14 PM
>>       Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any news?
>>
>>
>>       >I guess they're just tired of hearing that something's wrong? 
>> Sounds
>>       > like a give-up stratagy to me. Funny thing is, probably nobody 
>> will
>>       > buy this unless they want to just use Paul or enjoy the sounds of
>>       > clipping mutated DECTalks or something.
>>       >
>>       > Alex
>>       >
>>       > On 5/5/11, Jayson Smith <ratguy at insightbb.com> wrote:
>>       >> What the? This product, as we've seen it, is absolutely nowhere
>> near
>>       >> ready
>>       >> for release. It has several obvious bugs. One of the more 
>> crippling
>> and
>>       >> totally ridiculous in my opinion is that some of the factory
>> default
>>       >> voices
>>       >> are virtually unusable because their parameters are incorrect.
>> Factory
>>       >> voices, mind you. Not something some user has messed around with
>> and
>>       >> screwed
>>       >> up. Default voices, which are supposed to be usable. Sigh.
>>       >> Jayson
>>       >>
>>       >> ----- Original Message -----
>>       >> From: <Dectalk at aol.com>
>>       >> To: <dectalk at bluegrasspals.com>
>>       >> Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 6:54 PM
>>       >> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any news?
>>       >>
>>       >>
>>       >>> Ugh!  I just got word.  The programmer won't  be allowed to 
>> join
>> and
>>       >>> they're doing an "As is" release.   (SIGH)
>>       >>>
>>       >>> I can't write any more.
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> SNOOPI BOTTEN
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> In a message dated 5/5/2011 4:40:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>       >>> bmisch2002 at gmail.com writes:
>>       >>>
>>       >>> I see.  hope that this project gets fixed soon.
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> On May 5, 2011, at 4:12 PM, _Dectalk at aol.com_
>> (mailto:Dectalk at aol.com)
>>       >>> wrote:
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> Just so everyone knows, I'm not talking about Ed  at all.  It's
>> someone
>>       >>> else and I've been instructed not to post the  name.  Actually
>> I've been
>>       >>> told
>>       >>> to stop writing about the  programmer.  But just to be clear, 
>> it's
>> not
>>       >>> Ed,
>>       >>> it's someone  else.
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> SNOOPI BOTTEN
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> In a message dated 5/5/2011 3:54:36 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>       >>> _musicalman1 at comcast.net_ (mailto:musicalman1 at comcast.net)
>> writes:
>>       >>>
>>       >>> Very understandable. I did too, after hearing what you  were 
>> told.
>> I
>>       >>> really
>>       >>> hoep we can get him on this list and see what  comes out of it.
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> ----- Original Message -----
>>       >>> From:  _Dectalk at aol.com_ (mailto:Dectalk at aol.com)
>>       >>> To: _dectalk at bluegrasspals.com_ 
>> (mailto:dectalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>> Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 3:44  PM
>>       >>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any  news?
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> Maybe if we all ask nicely, someone who knows  the programmer 
>> will
>> get
>>       >>> that
>>       >>> person on here.  I just might not post  anything if this person
>> does
>>       >>> show
>>       >>> up.  After all, I got told I  don't know what I'm talking 
>> about.
>>       >>>
>>       >>> This person is smart, I just needed to  vent.  I work out of a
>> bedroom,
>>       >>> I'm
>>       >>> kind of trapped here  because the house is not wheelchair
>> accessible,
>>       >>> and
>>       >>> after I was told I  didn't know what I was talking about, I 
>> needed
>> to
>>       >>> vent.
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> SNOOPI BOTTEN
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> In a message dated 5/5/2011 3:32:34 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>       >>> _musicalman1 at comcast.net_ (mailto:musicalman1 at comcast.net)
>> writes:
>>       >>>
>>       >>> I'd like to chat with him at some point and help him  out if I
>> could.
>>       >>> I'm
>>       >>> sure some of us would too. Some changes really  need to be 
>> made.
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> ----- Original Message -----
>>       >>> From:  _Dectalk at aol.com_ (mailto:Dectalk at aol.com)
>>       >>> To: _dectalk at bluegrasspals.com_ 
>> (mailto:dectalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>> Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011  2:57 PM
>>       >>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any  news?
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> I have total faith in this list!  We  all know what we're 
>> doing,
>> so lets
>>       >>> work together and come up with  something for this programmer. 
>> I
>> know
>>       >>> this
>>       >>> person is doing  their best, but this is guess work.  Maybe we 
>> can
>> take
>>       >>> some
>>       >>> of  the guessing out of it?  Lets show this person we know our
>> stuff!
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> SNOOPI BOTTEN
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> In a message dated 5/5/2011 2:47:18 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>       >>> _musicalman1 at comcast.net_ (mailto:musicalman1 at comcast.net)
>> writes:
>>       >>>
>>       >>> I don't think it's much use. As I  have been saying, someone 
>> has
>> messsed
>>       >>> up
>>       >>> because of lack of  knowledge, and is being rather stubborn 
>> about
>>       >>> admitting
>>       >>> that  something needs fixed.
>>       >>> If we as a list could somehow make it  work, I'd say this thing
>> would be
>>       >>> turning a whole new direction.  For now we can only provide
>> feedback and
>>       >>> test.
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> ----- Original Message -----
>>       >>> From:  _Brandon Misch_ (mailto:bmisch2002 at gmail.com)
>>       >>> To: _DECtalk Discussions_ (mailto:dectalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>> Sent: Thursday, May 05,  2011 8:28 AM
>>       >>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any  news?
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> i see where you're coming from. have you shown  the programmers
>> other
>>       >>> samples like 4.61 etc? maybe you can show  them voices like 
>> betty
>> so
>>       >>> they
>>       >>> can see
>>       >>> where the loud pops are  coming from.
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> On May 5, 2011, at 5:59 AM, _Dectalk at aol.com_
>> (mailto:Dectalk at aol.com)
>>       >>> wrote:
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> The problem is, Blake and I have  done that.  We sent a sample 
>> of
>>       >>> version
>>       >>> 4.40 to the head  programmer to show how things should sound. 
>> We
>> got an
>>       >>> e-mail back saying our version sounded corrupted.  This  person
>> actually
>>       >>> said
>>       >>> that Whispering Wendy shouldn't be  whispering.  Hello, why 
>> does
>> this
>>       >>> person
>>       >>> think the name  is "Whispering Wendy"?
>>       >>>
>>       >>> It is totally clear to Blake and I  that this person doesn't 
>> know
>>       >>> Dectalk.
>>       >>> And if version  4.40 is viewed as corrupted, there is no hope 
>> if
>> getting
>>       >>> anything right.
>>       >>>
>>       >>> So because of this, I'm hoping the  project gets scrapped 
>> because
>> this
>>       >>> is
>>       >>> becoming in insult to  Dennis Klatt.
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> SNOOPI BOTTEN
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> In a message dated 5/5/2011 12:31:35 A.M. Eastern  Daylight 
>> Time,
>>       >>> _bmisch2002 at gmail.com_ (mailto:bmisch2002 at gmail.com)   writes:
>>       >>>
>>       >>> maybe you should send the demo file over to the  guys so they
>> could hear
>>       >>> that and how the other voices sound.
>>       >>>
>>       >>> On May 4, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Alex H.  wrote:
>>       >>>
>>       >>>> I wouldn't give up just yet. All they  need to do is convince
>> this guy
>>       >>>> that he's wrong and  there is a huge, huge difference in this
>> version
>>       >>>> and  the real 4.3 version. This new stuff reminds me of a 
>> early
>> age
>>       >>>> FonixTalk or something with a lot of excess  nasal tones.
>>       >>>>
>>       >>>> Alex
>>       >>>>
>>       >>>> On  5/4/11, _johnnybrl at gmail.com_ (mailto:johnnybrl at gmail.com)
>>       >>> <_johnnybrl at gmail.com_ (mailto:johnnybrl at gmail.com) >  wrote:
>>       >>>>> Well, since it looks like there won't be  a Sapi Dectalk, 
>> guess
>> it's
>>       >>> time to
>>       >>>>> look at  Neospeech voices or ivona voices.  It's too bad the
>> head
>>       >>> programer
>>       >>>>> can't tell the difference between  the Dectalk 4.6 and 
>> Dectalk
>> 4.3
>>       >>> versions.
>>       >>>>>
>>       >>>>> O well, was really looking forward to a Sapi  version of
>> Dectalk.
>>       >>>>> ----- Original Message  -----
>>       >>>>> From: "Blake Roberts" <_beroberts at hughes.net_
>>       >>> (mailto:beroberts at hughes.net) >
>>       >>>>>  To: "'DECtalk Discussions'" <_dectalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>>       >>> (mailto:dectalk at bluegrasspals.com) >
>>       >>>>>  Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 2:06 PM
>>       >>>>> Subject:  Re: [DECtalk] Any news?
>>       >>>>>
>>       >>>>>
>>       >>>>>> Thanks Alex for being the latest list  member to point out 
>> need
>> for
>>       >>>>>>  improvement.  I agree with you that there are clipping/
>> drop-out
>>       >>> issues.
>>       >>>>>> Additionally, I agree the  SAPI Dectalk  referred to as 4.3 
>> is
>> unlike
>>       >>> any
>>       >>>>>> version of Dectalk I have ever heard. I,  too, am unwilling 
>> to
>> give
>>       >>>>>> up
>>       >>> on
>>       >>>>>> SAPI  Dectalk.
>>       >>>>>> Blake
>>       >>>>>> -----Original  Message-----
>>       >>>>>> From: _dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com_
>>       >>> (mailto:dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>  [mailto:dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com] On Behalf Of 
>> Alex
>> H.
>>       >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:59  PM
>>       >>>>>> To: DECtalk Discussions
>>       >>>>>>  Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any news?
>>       >>>>>>
>>       >>>>>> Just heard the demo, and.... Well, I agree  with Snoopi, 
>> it's
>>       >>>>>> terrible.
>>       >>>>>> I don't know who  was telling you that nothing's wrong, but
>> this
>>       >>> doesn't
>>       >>>>>> sound even remotely like any DECTalk  version I've heard.
>>       >>>>>>
>>       >>>>>> That  being said, the Huge Harry voice is kinda cool, but 
>> yeah
>>       >>>>>> there's
>>       >>> some
>>       >>>>>> issues with clipping and  dropouts in the voices, especially
>> with
>>       >>> Ursula
>>       >>>>>> and
>>       >>>>>>  Rita.
>>       >>>>>>
>>       >>>>>> I don't think we  should give up quite yet though, good 
>> things
>> come
>>       >>>>>> to
>>       >>>>>> those
>>       >>>>>> who wait. Giving up  on this would mean that I and other 
>> users
>> of
>>       >>>>>> NVDA
>>       >>>>>> wouldn't be able to enjoy DECTalk's  great speech.
>>       >>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>
>>       >>>>>> Alex
>>       >>>>>>
>>       >>>>>> On  5/4/11, Jayson Smith <_ratguy at insightbb.com_
>>       >>> (mailto:ratguy at insightbb.com) >  wrote:
>>       >>>>>>> Hi,
>>       >>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>> One clarification. From what I  understand, Enable didn't
>> purchase
>>       >>>>>>> the
>>       >>>>>>>  rights to any DECtalk version. They only have the right to
>> sell,
>>       >>>>>>> not
>>       >>>>>>> full copyright. As I  understand it, the copyright of 
>> DECtalk
>> is
>>       >>>>>>> still
>>       >>>>>>> held by Fonix. I could be wrong  though, I'm no lawyer.
>>       >>>>>>>  Jayson
>>       >>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>> -----  Original Message -----
>>       >>>>>>> From: "Brandon  Misch" <_bmisch2002 at gmail.com_
>>       >>> (mailto:bmisch2002 at gmail.com) >
>>       >>>>>>>  To: "DECtalk Discussions" <_dectalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>>       >>> (mailto:dectalk at bluegrasspals.com) >
>>       >>>>>>>  Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:28 PM
>>       >>>>>>>  Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any news?
>>       >>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>> it also was 4.6.7  at one time. i doubt this project will
>> please
>>       >>> everyone.
>>       >>>>>>> all we know is enable rehab  purchased the wrights to 4.6.7
>> from
>>       >>>>>>> fonix
>>       >>>>>>> and trying to use that with the  4.3 data files wasn't a 
>> good
>> idea.
>>       >>>>>>>  question is did this happen with other versions of 
>> dectalk?
>> or
>>       >>>>>>> just
>>       >>> with
>>       >>>>>> this  version?
>>       >>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>> On May 4,  2011, at 4:13 PM, Raymond Grote wrote:
>>       >>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>> Yes, but many people miss the old  dectalk 4.3 days. I 
>> really
>> never
>>       >>>>>>>> got  into dectalk, but I can see why. That version of the
>> synth
>>       >>>>>>>> and
>>       >>>>>>>> I
>>       >>>>>>>> stilll  do
>>       >>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>> have a  special place together even though I was never a
>> regular
>>       >>>>>>>> dectalk user. The major  disappointment for many of us is 
>> it
>>       >>>>>>>> doesn't
>>       >>>>>>>> sound like that, it's worse,  and to some of us it is
>> unusable.
>>       >>>>>>>> From
>>       >>>>>>>> my  understanding,
>>       >>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>> someone had posted that the synth  was supposed to sound 
>> like
>>       >>>>>>>> 4.6.4,
>>       >>>>>>>>  then somewhere along the line it was changed to  4.3?
>>       >>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>> -----  Original Message -----
>>       >>>>>>>> From: Brandon  Misch
>>       >>>>>>>> To: DECtalk  Discussions
>>       >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 04,  2011 1:21 PM
>>       >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk]  Any news?
>>       >>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>  if this was fixed up, it could still be used as a sapi 5
>> synth.
>>       >>>>>>>> that's  all
>>       >>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>> it  needs for it to be a screen reader  voice.
>>       >>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>> On  May 4, 2011, at 1:13 PM, <_johnnybrl at gmail.com_
>>       >>> (mailto:johnnybrl at gmail.com) >  wrote:
>>       >>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message  -----
>>       >>>>>>>>> cool just heard the demo.  And yes it doesn't sound like 
>> 4.3
>> but
>>       >>>>>>>>> the
>>       >>>>>>>>> Paul voice sounds pretty  cool.
>>       >>>>>>>>> And Frank doesn't sound  too bad either.  It kind of 
>> reminds
>> me
>>       >>>>>>>>> of
>>       >>>>>>>>> the fonix talk demo. sounds  almost like that.
>>       >>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>> And it sounds like this version  of dectalk has more
>> inflection
>>       >>>>>>>>> than
>>       >>>>>>>>> 4.3 did, which I like. I  like lots of inflection in
>> synthes,
>>       >>>>>>>>> makes
>>       >>>>>>>>> them  sound
>>       >>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>> cool  lol.
>>       >>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>> Back in high school, we had a  computer with Jaws with a
>> Dectalk
>>       >>>>>>>>> express hooked up to it,  and I used to go in there and 
>> make
>>       >>>>>>>>> Dectalk
>>       >>>>>>>>> say things  lol.
>>       >>>>>>>>> From: Brandon  Misch
>>       >>>>>>>>> To: DECtalk  Discussions
>>       >>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May  04, 2011 9:52 AM
>>       >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re:  [DECtalk] Any news?
>>       >>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>> if you read below our messages,  you'll see a link to a 
>> file
>> with
>>       >>> the
>>       >>>>>>>>>  demo
>>       >>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>> inside. if you just want to use  paul and a few others, 
>> it
>> works
>>       >>>>>>>>> but
>>       >>>>>>>>> not for all  voices.
>>       >>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>> On May 4, 2011, at 12:45 PM,  <_johnnybrl at gmail.com_
>>       >>> (mailto:johnnybrl at gmail.com) >  wrote:
>>       >>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>> hi, where did you guys get  the audio samples of the 
>> sapi
>> dectalk
>>       >>> from?
>>       >>>>>>>>>> sounds like you guys  have already heard it.
>>       >>>>>>>>>> -----  Original Message -----
>>       >>>>>>>>>> From:  Brandon Misch
>>       >>>>>>>>>> To: DECtalk  Discussions
>>       >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday,  May 04, 2011 9:37 AM
>>       >>>>>>>>>>  Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any  news?
>>       >>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>> ok some of the voices work  while others don't. i can 
>> see
>> what
>>       >>>>>>>>>> you
>>       >>>>>>>>>> meant by bad  quality.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>> On May 4, 2011, at 12:17  PM, _Dectalk at aol.com_
>>       >>> (mailto:Dectalk at aol.com)   wrote:
>>       >>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> _http://pastorsnoopi.twigs76.com/music/SAPI%20DEMO.mp3_
>>       >>> (http://pastorsnoopi.twigs76.com/music/SAPI%20DEMO.mp3)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> The above link is the  sample that people wanted. 
>> Blake
>> and I
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> are
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> both told that there  is no problem.  Tell that to our
>> ears.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  (YUCK)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> SNOOPI  BOTTEN
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> In a message dated  5/4/2011 11:16:00 A.M. Eastern
>> Daylight
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Time,
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> _edbruckert at gmail.com_ (mailto:edbruckert at gmail.com)
>> writes:
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> All that means  is what you are sent is not acceptable
>> don't
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> worry
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  it'll
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> be solved I promise at  this point in my life I need it 
>> as
>> much
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> as
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> anybody  else
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at  10:48 AM, <_Dectalk at aol.com_
>>       >>> (mailto:Dectalk at aol.com) >  wrote:
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Brace yourselves  because I don't think you guys will 
>> like
>> it.
>>       >>> The
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  very
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> worst voice is  Kit.  I'd do the recording for you guys
>> but  I
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> really don't want to  be linked with this pour Dectalk
>> quality.
>>       >>> Have
>>       >>>>>> fun  guys.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> SNOOPI  BOTTEN
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> In a message dated  5/4/2011 9:10:14 A.M. Eastern 
>> Daylight
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Time,
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> _ratguy at insightbb.com_ (mailto:ratguy at insightbb.com)
>> writes:
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  Hi,
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Here's a sample text. I  assume you can use DECtalk
>> commands in
>>       >>> the
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> text?  An
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> MP3 of the 4.3 speak  application performing this exact
>> text can
>>       >>> be
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> found  at
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> _http://www.bluegrasspals.com/dt43sample.mp3_
>>       >>> (http://www.bluegrasspals.com/dt43sample.mp3)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  Now here's the text.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:phoneme  on]
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:np] [:ra  250]
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Hello. This is the  factory default Paul  voice.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> I'm talking now  with this voice since this is what 
>> most
>> people
>>       >>> are
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> probably going to be  using. Let's speed it up a  bit.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:ra  300]
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> This is probably  how Jayson's JFW would talk normally.
>> Now
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> let's
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> put some  intonation in there.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  [:dv pr 250] [:dv sr 50]
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  Okay, this is how Jayson used to listen to DECtalk 
>> back
>> in  the
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> good  old
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  DOS
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> days. With 4.3 and  earlier, if you could get used to 
>> this
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> which
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> you would over  time, this sounds pretty good! It'd 
>> take
>> some
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> getting used to  again, not having had it for so  long.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:np] [:ra  250]
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> The rest of this  demo was created a few months ago to
>> compair
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> and
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> test the various  other factory voices and several 
>> custom
>> voices
>>       >>> in
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> different DECtalk  versions.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> I will now  test the other voices.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  [:nb] I'm Beautiful Betty, the default female  voice.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nh] I'm Huge  Harry.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nd] I'm Doctor  Dennis.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nf] I'm Frail  Frank.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nu] I'm Uppity  Ursula.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nr] I'm Rough  Rita.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nw] I'm  Whispering Wendy.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nk]  and I'm Kit the Kid.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  [:np]
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Now I'll let the  DECtalk manual describe  us.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:np]     Perfect Paul         Standard male  voice.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nb]   Beautiful Betty Standard female  voice.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nh]   Huge Harry      Deep male  voice.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nf]   Frail Frank         Older male  voice.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nk]   Kit the Kid         Child's voice (about 10 
>> years
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  old).
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nr]     Rough Rita      Deep female  voice.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nu]   Uppity Ursula   Light female  voice.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nd]   Doctor Dennis   Breathy male  voice.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nw]   Whispering Wendy Whispery female  voice.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  [:np]
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Okay, let's test a  few custom voices.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nf]  [:dv br 0 la 0 sr 100 hr 100 ap 150 pr 95] [:ra
>> 220] This
>>       >>> is
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> the voice of Rimmer  from Red Dwarf.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Lister,  we are being tested! I don't know what to  do!
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nf] [:ra 240] [:dv  br 0 hs 95 ap 100 as 100 pr 220 
>> hr
>> 30 sr
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> 30]
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> This is  Lister.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Rimmer! Come  over here and help me with this new 
>> speech
>>       >>> synthesizer!
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:np] [:dv  as 0 bf 0 la 20 nf 00 ri 100 sm 0 hr 0 sr 
>> 0]
>> [:ra
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> 220]
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> This is  Holly.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> This is an  important announcement. All persons aboard
>> this
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> ship
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> are to report to  the voice calibration office at once.
>> That is
>>       >>> all.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:np] [:dv br 100  lx 100 bf 100 hr 100 sr 100 as 100 
>> qu
>> 100 ap
>>       >>> 110
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> pr 150  sx
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> 1 la 0]  [:ra  210] This is the voice of the  toaster.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> I don't know  where this voice calibration office is. 
>> Does
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> anyone
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> want some  toast?
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:np] [:dv sm 1  hs 90  br 0 ri 0 la 0] [:ra 250] I'm 
>> the
>> cat.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Who says my voice  needs to be calibrated? I want
>> fishies!
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nd] [:dv as 0  bf 0 la 20 nf 00 ri 100 hr 0 sr 0] 
>> [:ra
>> 220]
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> I'm
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Queeg  500.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> None of you have  any credit, so you may not use the 
>> voice
>>       >>> calibrator.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> [:nu] [:dv  as 1 bf 10 la 30 nf 10 ri 100 sm 50 hr 100 
>> sr
>> 20  ap
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> 130] [:ra 240] I'm  the newer voice of  Holly.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> I'm picking  something up. It's another ship. Its name 
>> is
>> Deck
>>       >>> Talk
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> or something very  close. They have been conducting an
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> experiment
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> on us  all
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  this
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> time. That would  explain why we've been saying all 
>> these
>> silly
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  things.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  I
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> knew I was having  trouble finding a record of any 
>> voice
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> calibration office  on Red Dwarf.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message  -----
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> From: "Corine  Bickley" <_corine.bickley at gallaudet.edu_
>>       >>> (mailto:corine.bickley at gallaudet.edu) >
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  To: "DECtalk Discussions" <_dectalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>>       >>> (mailto:dectalk at bluegrasspals.com) >
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 7:02  AM
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re:  [DECtalk] Any news?
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> HI  Jayson,
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> I will do  that. Could you suggest some sample 
>> sentences
>> to
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>  synthesize?
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> We're  trying to find a way to put a "demo play" 
>> button
>> on  the
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> Enable website  so people can type in any text they'd
>> like  to
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> hear, but our  programmer hasn't been able to spend 
>> time
>> on
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>       >>>>>> project right  now.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>  corine
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 3, 2011  at 8:12 PM, Jayson  Smith
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> <_ratguy at insightbb.com_ (mailto:ratguy at insightbb.com) 
>>  >
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you  have any audio samples you could share? Maybe 
>> I
>> could
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> elaborate  on what people don't like. I pretty much 
>> know
>> what
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> DT
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.3 sounds  like.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>  Jayson
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original  Message -----
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>  From: "Corine Bickley" 
>> <_corine.bickley at gallaudet.edu_
>>       >>> (mailto:corine.bickley at gallaudet.edu) >
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>  To: "DECtalk Discussions" 
>> <_dectalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>>       >>> (mailto:dectalk at bluegrasspals.com) >
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>  Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 7:53  PM
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re:  [DECtalk] Any  news?
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> i meant - i  can't hear the differences, not being 
>> so
>> attuned
>>       >>> to
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the   various DT versions. i can hear ok, but i'm 
>> not
>> clear
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the   differences in  quality.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May  3, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Jayson  Smith
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <_ratguy at insightbb.com_ 
>> (mailto:ratguy at insightbb.com) >
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Hi,
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wo, you  actually got 4.3 working with SAPI? What 
>> kind
>>  of
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  quality problems are  there?
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Thanks.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----  Original Message  -----
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  From: "Corine Bickley"
>> <_corine.bickley at gallaudet.edu_
>>       >>> (mailto:corine.bickley at gallaudet.edu) >
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  To: "DECtalk Discussions"
>> <_dectalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>>       >>> (mailto:dectalk at bluegrasspals.com) >
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 6:14  PM
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any  news?
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Still waiting for one of the "old" (not
>> chronologically,
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  just in terms of contact with DT) to send some 
>> more
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  for  testing.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  4.3 and 4.67 work in SAPI fine but preliminary
>> listening
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  results indicate  dissatisfaction.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  corine
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On  Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Jayson  Smith
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <_ratguy at insightbb.com_
>> (mailto:ratguy at insightbb.com) >
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Okay, it's broken record time. Anything new 
>> going
>> on
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  the SAPI  DECtalk?
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Haven't heard anything in a  while.
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Jayson
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing  list
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>>       >>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>> _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing  list
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>>       >>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>> _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing  list
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>> _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing  list
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing  list
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>  _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>>>>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>>>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>>>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>       >>>>>>>  ----------
>>       >>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_ 
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_ 
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>>
>>       >>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_ 
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>
>>       >>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_ 
>> (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>>>
>>       >>>>  _______________________________________________
>>       >>>>  DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_ (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>>>  _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> _______________________________________________
>>       >>> DECtalk  mailing list
>>       >>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_ (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>> _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> _______________________________________________
>>       >>> DECtalk  mailing list
>>       >>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_ (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>> _http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk_
>>       >>> (http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk)
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> ____________________________________
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> _______________________________________________
>>       >>> DECtalk  mailing list
>>       >>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_ (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> _______________________________________________
>>       >>> DECtalk  mailing list
>>       >>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_ (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> ____________________________________
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> _______________________________________________
>>       >>> DECtalk  mailing list
>>       >>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_ (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> _______________________________________________
>>       >>> DECtalk  mailing list
>>       >>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_ (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> ____________________________________
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> _______________________________________________
>>       >>> DECtalk  mailing list
>>       >>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_ (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> _______________________________________________
>>       >>> DECtalk  mailing list
>>       >>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_ (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> _______________________________________________
>>       >>> DECtalk  mailing list
>>       >>> _DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com_ (mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com)
>>       >>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>> _______________________________________________
>>       >>> DECtalk  mailing  list
>>       >>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>       >>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>       >>>
>>       >>>
>>       >>
>>       >>
>>       >>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>       >>
>>       >>
>>       >>> _______________________________________________
>>       >>> DECtalk mailing list
>>       >>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>       >>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>       >>>
>>       >>
>>       >> _______________________________________________
>>       >> DECtalk mailing list
>>       >> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>       >> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>       >>
>>       > _______________________________________________
>>       > DECtalk mailing list
>>       > DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>       > http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>
>>       _______________________________________________
>>       DECtalk mailing list
>>       DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>       http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     DECtalk mailing list
>>     DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>     http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>   _______________________________________________
>>   DECtalk mailing list
>>   DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>   http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>
> _______________________________________________
> DECtalk mailing list
> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk 




More information about the Dectalk mailing list