[DECtalk] TEST

[Alex H.]

Agree 100% Snoopi. I've also sent an essay about this too <grin>


Alex

On 6/27/2011 7:05 PM, Dectalk at aol.com wrote:
> *Ok Corine, let all of us educate you, I'll start. *
> **
> *Evoice for me was my only real connection to the blind community.  
> Corine, I thought you knew how much of an impact Dennis Klatt was.  
> Most blind people make it sing.  Evoice was full of crazy stuff that 
> people worldwide did with Dectalk. *
> **
> *Go up to most blind people and ask if they heard of Dectalk.  If they 
> have, their face glows and they always say "I love how it sings", 
> always! *
> **
> *www.dectalk.com <http://www.dectalk.com> is only a small 
> representation of what people do with Dectalk.  Even on this list 
> someone made an entire windows 7 sound packet using Dectalk. *
> **
> *If Dectalk couldn't sing, no one would have a reason to use it.  It 
> is the funest thing on Earth because it can sing, it can act, it can 
> do anything.  That's what makes it Dectalk, it can sing. *
> **
> **
> *SNOOPI BOTTEN *
> **
> In a message dated 6/27/2011 6:33:49 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
> enablerehab at verizon.net writes:
>
>     There are other users of DECtalk than those who use it for singing.
>
>     *From:* "Dectalk at aol.com" <Dectalk at aol.com>
>     *To:* dectalk at bluegrasspals.com
>     *Sent:* Mon, June 27, 2011 2:10:43 PM
>     *Subject:* Re: [DECtalk] TEST
>
>     *Actually I was scared I was removed for exploding on the list
>     last night.  I also find it odd that Corine never apologized for
>     her misleading post.  I'm still in total shock at how her post was
>     worded.  And to post that on the list when we all have a speak
>     window or other form of Dectalk.  Heck, if I did have a singing
>     SAPI, why would anyone buy her non-singing version? *
>     **
>     *That post just totally made no sense to me.  I still feel bad
>     about my response, but I was and still am angry. *
>     **
>     **
>     *SNOOPI BOTTEN *
>     In a message dated 6/27/2011 1:22:03 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>     linuxx64.bashsh at gmail.com writes:
>
>         Your message came through. It's all good.
>
>         Alex
>
>         On 6/27/2011 12:58 PM, Dectalk at aol.com
>         <mailto:Dectalk at aol.com> wrote:
>>         My mail got too full, so I'm just making sure everything is ok.
>>         **
>>         *SNOOPI BOTTEN *
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         DECtalk mailing list
>>         DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com  <mailto:DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com>
>>         http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>
>
>         -- 
>         Sent via Thunderbird.
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         DECtalk mailing list
>         DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>         http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     DECtalk mailing list
>     DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>     http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DECtalk mailing list
> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk


-- 
Sent via Thunderbird.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bluegrasspals.com/pipermail/dectalk/attachments/20110627/c462cc28/attachment.html>