[DECtalk] Status of the archive

[shaun everiss]

there is a windows build though forgot where.
At 05:30 p.m. 24/09/2009, you wrote:
>It's interesting that you mention this.  As you say, there are other 
>synths represented.  As far as I'm aware, it has never been limited to 
>only the DECtalk.  I know of at least one thing done with the Apple II 
>Echo and one with the Doubletalk.  I have several demos of a synth 
>called Mbrola which I was thinking of adding.  Mbrola can sing and 
>produces good speech quality.  The problem is that it isn't based on 
>SAPI and requires all text to be sent as phonemes.  I don't know if it 
>runs on Windows or not.  If people want to use other synths, that's fine 
>with me.  The archive name won't change for historical interest, but I 
>would be glad to split off other synths into their own archives or as a 
>new section of the current archive.  I'm fairly sure that Mbrola 
>requires Linux.
>
>On 9/23/2009 12:07 AM, shaun everiss wrote:
>> well I think it has, no more dectalk externals and the dectalk bar the access32 system is becoming a quite old system.
>> I think the archive should still exist for those that want to get it, but I suspect there will probably be no real contributers.
>> I think its time to change the archive, who said that dectalk could be the only thing used.
>> I wander if one should encourage other users of different synths to  do music in those things and put it up.
>> I know there are other synths up there but still I wander.
>>    
>
>_______________________________________________
>DECtalk mailing list
>DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>http://jaybird.no-ip.info/mailman/listinfo/dectalk